#AntiSlaveryDay and safe reporting: The case of the Latin-American community

Written by: Nahir de la Silva: Policy and Communications Coordinator – Employment Rights at the Latin American Women Rights Service


Today in #AntiSlaveryDay, it is crucial that migrant women who experience extreme labour exploitation in outsourcing sectors like cleaning, catering and hospitality are recognised as victims regardless of the immigration status they hold.

Establishing a firewall for safe reporting will ensure that labour enforcement and the police better identify vulnerabilities of insecure legal status used by traffickers and abusive employers.


The Latin-American community and in-work poverty

The Latin American community is one of London’s fastest growing groups. Most migrate fleeing the economic crisis, poverty, exploitation and violence. Paradoxically, many of them confront the very same problems upon arrival in the UK. A large proportion of these women workers are affected by “in- work” poverty and remain concentrated in vulnerable, low-paid, over-exploitative, unregulated jobs. These sectors ate cleaning, domestic work and hospitality.

LAWRS’ survey and domestic work

The following data represents the initial findings of a survey study carried out with 50 women working as domestic workers conducted by LAWRS (to be published in 2018):

9.4% of the women reported they worked more than what they were hired to do

17% earn less than the national minimum wage.

39% does not have a written contract.

• 57% experienced verbal abuse and threats.

• 14% experienced abuse and/or sexual harassment.

• The “normal” working hours for domestic workers were from 12 to 16 hours per day.

• Some of them experienced denial or were provided only a minimum amount of food.

The main barriers LAWRS has experienced to refer the cases to NRM first responders agencies were:

1) forms of exploitation

2) immigration status

3) Latin American potential victims.

Forms of exploitation and homelessness

Regarding the type of exploitation, since September 2017 LAWRS received five cases with elements of severe exploitation of domestic workers. However, we noticed that the level of threshold that the police and first responders’ agencies apply is high and the evidence that the person needs to provide is large. For those reasons, the police often do not accept the report of the crime over ‘poor evidence’.

Trafficking often results from organized crime but in many cases results from individual experiences that move within the continuum between labour exploitation and more severe cases of trafficking or modern slavery. The line between these two it is a very fine line that often cannot be clearly defined.

Modern slavery needs to be combatted but there also needs to be targeted efforts to tackle labour exploitation.

Immigration status
In all the cases where LAWRS identified indicators of modern slavery, immigration status was used by employers as a threat of deportation.
Even in cases where the victims were European nationals, the employers were threatened them with the lack of the legal right to work in the UK due to Brexit.
At LAWRS, we have an obligation to inform potential victims on the process and the impact it can have on their immigration status. The uncertainty that the system brings to non UK/EU nationals is an important barrier to reporting.
Latin American potential victims

LAWRS is concerned about the number of Latin American potential victims of modern slavery referred to the National Referral Mechanism. It is important to recognize and tackle the barriers to reporting (language barrier, lack of knowledge of the system, lack of protection of victims’ rights above immigration enforcement, etc.).

In other European countries such as The Netherlands and Spain, Latin Americans are amongst the most common nationalities identified as victims of sexual exploitation.

LAWRS believes that the lack of recognition of Latin American as an ethnic group impacts the numbers of potential victims of the region and Latin American women still remain invisible as potential victims of modern slavery in the UK.


1. Targeted efforts should be made to tackle labour exploitation, by working alongside other agencies for appropriate enforcement of employment rights in outsourcing sectors, particularly in cleaning, catering and hospitality. In many cases,  migrant women are within the continuum between labour exploitation and more severe cases of trafficking or modern slavery. The line between these two is a very fine line that could not be clearly defined.

2. It is important to raise awareness among police officers (as well as other enforcement authorities including labour enforcement and the judicial system), about the experiences of migrant women victims who are unable to speak English and may lack understanding of the system and their rights, in order to lessen the discriminatory bias and to improve the ability of police officers to properly identify victims. In addition, training should be provided about forms of gender-based violence at work and its impact on the self-identification of women as victims, particularly in feminised sectors of the labour market. 

3. In terms of severe forms of exploitation, trafficking and modern slavery, these agendas should not be employed to increase the criminalisation of migration. Survivor’s rights should always be above immigration control. Unfortunately, successive and punitive immigration acts are only making it harder for victims with insecure migration status to report and in the vast majority of cases involving migrant women, there is a high level of underreporting. 

4. The establishment of a firewall for safe reporting, ensuring that workers who are victims are able to safely report abuse without being subjected to immigration enforcement. Understanding of the vulnerability derived from an insecure legal status is crucial to a sound understanding of human trafficking and modern slavery, as it is often the result as well as a source of vulnerability that is exploited by traffickers and abusive employers.

Contact details – Lucila Granada, Director: lucila@lawrs.org.uk – Nahir de la Silva, Policy and Communications Coordinator – Employment Rights: nahirdelasilva@lawrs.org.uk
Specialist thanks to Ana Sofia Baillet for the infographics and translations in English and Spanish and Priscila Brandao for the translation in Portuguese
Mcllwaine C., Bunge D., Towards visibility: the Latin American community in London, Queen Mary University of London, Latin American Women’s Rights Service and Trust for London, 2016
2 UNHCR, Eligibility Guidelines for Assessing the International Protection Needs of Asylum-Seekers from El Salvador, March 2016
3 UNHCR, Eligibility Guidelines for Assessing the International Protection Needs of Asylum-Seekers from Honduras, July 2016
4 Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre IDMC and Spindler W., UNHCR Forced displacement growing in Colombia despite peace agreement, 2017
5 National Rapporteur on Trafficking in Human Beings and Sexul Violence against Children, Trafficking in Human Beings, Ninth Report of the Dutch National Rapporteur, 2013, 54 and A. Van Wijk, A. Nieuwenhuis, D. van Tuyn, T. van Ham, J. Kuppens, H. Ferwerda, Kwetsbaar beroep. Een onderzoek naar de prostitutiebranche in Amsterdam, Amsterdam: Bureau Beke 2010
6 United States Department State, 2015 Trafficking in Persons Report – United States of America, July 2015,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.